The AI Tutor will answer grounded in this lesson's cited source (external: SAP-101) and key concepts — authority Informational. Not yet enabled.
What TrustedAIGov does for an SAP customer
TrustedAIGov is the independent system of record for AI governance across a customer's whole AI estate — the SAP-embedded AI (Joule, SuccessFactors modules, S/4HANA ML), custom models built on SAP BTP / AI Core, and the non-SAP AI that every enterprise also runs (Azure OpenAI, Microsoft 365 Copilot, supplier-operated models). One inventory, one identity per system, three regulatory lenses.
What you can stand behind (available today)
- EU AI Act compliance for the estate — role determination (provider/deployer, immutable records), obligations instantiated per role and risk tier from a legal-source registry, FRIAs with the six Article 27 elements, Article 50 transparency assessments, EU-database registrations, and an Article 73 serious-incident register with a statutory clock computed on read.
- ISO/IEC 42001 AIMS operation — scope and interested parties, versioned AI policy, a Statement of Applicability with per-control decisions, risk register, impact assessments with independent approval, competence, records retention with legal holds, change control, internal audit, CAPA, and management review with frozen snapshots. A certifiable-AIMS-in-a-box workflow set.
- AI estate register and governed intake — a canonical, tenant-scoped, cryptographically anchored asset register with a candidate → review → approve → promote lifecycle and strict promotion gates (approved, with a human-confirmed owner). Estates arrive by normalising the exports your customer already produces — application inventory, vendor register, procurement register, CMDB.
- Assurance and audit readiness — evidence with SHA-256, expiry and review state; a signed governance dossier with a hash chain of custody; assurance packs; auditor PBC workspace.
The boundary that keeps you honest
TrustedAIGov does not connect into the customer's SAP systems. There is no RFC/BAPI call, no OData pull, no live scan of S/4HANA. This is a deliberate architecture choice, and it is a selling point: an independent governance record has more assurance value precisely because it is not operated by the system being governed.
So describe the intake accurately. It is governed intake and a system of record — a workshop-shaped product that fits the SI motion — not a discovery scanner. Say "we industrialise what your teams already export, and we govern what arrives." Never say "connector", "we scan your S/4HANA", or "real-time interception." A customer's technical due diligence will check, and the accurate story is the one that wins the trust the whole product is about.
Next: see how all of this lands in a single 30-minute story.