The AI Tutor will answer grounded in this lesson's cited source (jira_story: GOV-134) and key concepts — authority Informational. Not yet enabled.
Lesson 5 of 7 — Findings list and detail
Governance Workspace Core · Source: Jira Story GOV-134 (3 pts) · Authority: Informational (the Jira story is authoritative).
Purpose
Manage findings with scoped filtering and audited edits.
Why it matters
Findings are the backlog of governance gaps; they need triage and history.
Where this lives
Runs in the Customer AI Governance platform (components: workspace). A filterable findings view with audited status/owner edits. Learn teaches this read-only.
Workflow
- Given a set of findings
- When they are filtered
- Then results are scoped and status/owner edits persist with audit
Worked example
A finding's owner is changed but no history is recorded. What's missing?
The audit entry — every status/owner edit must persist with an audit trail.
Acceptance criteria (authoritative — GOV-134)
Given a set of findings, when they are filtered, then results are scoped and status/owner edits persist with audit.
Common pitfalls
- Edits that don't write an audit entry, breaking traceability.
Knowledge check
- Scenario: A finding's owner is changed but no history is recorded. What's missing?
- Look for: The audit entry — every status/owner edit must persist with an audit trail.
Key concepts
- findings triage
- scoped filter
- audited edits
For the AI Tutor
- Summary: Manage findings with scoped filtering and audited edits.
- When to use: teaching or answering questions about "findings list and detail".
- When NOT to use: computing posture from closed work (that is GOV-135).
- Key concepts: findings triage, scoped filter, audited edits.
Completion criteria
Learner passes the scenario knowledge check and can point to the system state that satisfies GOV-134's acceptance criterion.
Related
- Module: LEARN-MOD-003 (Governance Workspace Core)
- Provenance: LEARN-MAP-001 · Generation standard: LEARN-STD-002
- Next: LEARN-LSN-020